2010-02-25 / Letters

Can’t we disagree without getting personal about it?

(Sherry) Jensen is always hell-bent on calling people ignorant for debating anything that doesn’t correlate with the progressive agenda, like the fraud in-chief of the global warming movement that says the debate is over.

One red flag, Jensen—Al Gore is a hypocrite.

He talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk, meaning he duped you into believing his cherry-picked scientists who had huge incentives to bring about awareness by fudging numbers and manipulating data to trick you.

Phil Jones, head of the climate research unit in East Anglia, admitted there’s been no significant warming for 15 years and has admitted there’s been a cooling period since 2002.

What about all of the scientists who debunk all of this? Of course they’ve been silenced, in part due to threats that won’t allow them to receive research funds if they disagree.

What’s wrong with Beck and O’Reilly debating it?

Wouldn’t you, if you found out that scientists were actually fudging numbers to fool people?

What are their intentions for that?

Money, socialism, government control, taxing the people to reduce the Earth’s temperature by 0.1 degree?

Jensen, who do you think you are, calling people of your community ignorant just because we want to know what’s behind the agenda-driven scientists’ motives for manipulating data?

Do you just want us to be environmental sheep like you, no questions asked, because you know for sure that the planet is doomed because of man?

Did you ever bother to ask yourself maybe the sun will refuse to shine tomorrow for no reason at all.

You’re too smart for all of us ignorant people; God, you are kooky!

Cap and trade is dead, too!
Greg Taft
Westlake Village

Return to top