Parks should belong to dogs as well as people
Having hiked or run in Point Mugu State Park several times weekly since 1991, I was dismayed to discover a big sign has been posted banning dogs along the trail to the waterfall, which also leads down Little Sycamore Canyon.
A zealous park volunteer on horseback informed me the park is designated as “state wilderness,” and dogs aren’t allowed in any state wilderness areas.
According to him, they’re permitted only along the main road into the park. This is limiting and not a particularly pleasant place to walk or run, as there’s a lot of traffic—bikes and even cars.
In the 18 years I’ve used the trails, I’ve encountered many dogs, so if it was always a rule, it was neither clearly warned about in a sign nor previously enforced.
When was it designated a wilderness area, I wonder, and if it was a long time ago, why the sudden crackdown on dogs?
Who makes such decisions, and can taxpaying citizens have any say in the matter? To dog lovers and anyone who objects to a growing bureaucratic encroachment on our ability to freely enjoy our open space, please contact the state parks (info@parks.ca.gov) and let them know how you feel.
We have a world-class park right next door. What a shame it isn’t fully accessible.
Dogs need exercise, too. If we’re not careful, horses will be next and perhaps people after that!
Park management might well argue this: It’s all better for the ecosystem. And it’s mere coincidence that it makes their jobs easier, too. Fran Doucedame Newbury Park



