Propositions flame out at the ballot box

Local politicians and educators are planning their next steps following Tuesday's defeat of five of six ballot propositions that intended to reduce the state's budget deficit.

The measures called for a combination of spending caps, tax hikes and borrowing from other funds—but they only received about 35 percent of the vote. A majority was needed to pass.

A sixth proposition, which freezes politicians' salaries in years that the state is running a deficit, passed and won easily with 74 percent of the ballots.

While the message from the May 19 election remains unclear given the public's conflicting desire for low taxes and expensive services, state Sen. Tony Strickland (R-Thousand Oaks), who represents the 19th district for T.O. and other areas, said the voters "have spoken."

"The people . . . have sent a clear message to politicians that they are tired with business as usual in Sacramento," Strickland said. "Voters made it clear by (the) election results that they don't want higher taxes or borrowing to solve the budget crisis."

Proposition 1A would have meant $16 billion in tax increases and spending restrictions that would have boosted the state's rainy day fun. Proposition 1B, which would have earmarked more than $9 billion for education, fared better than the other losing propositions and received 37 percent in favor.

Proposition 1C would have provided $5 billion in borrowing from future lottery revenues. And 1D and 1E called for taking almost $1 billion in monies that were promised earlier for child services and mental healthcare.

Representatives from the California School Boards Association said that even if the propositions had passed, the initiatives would not have addressed California's "ongoing structural imbalance between revenues and expenditures."

"Voters have continuously expressed that investing in our children's education is a top priority, yet we are still the first to hit the chopping block," CSBA Executive Director Scott Plotkin said. "It's mind boggling to imagine what these additional cuts will do to our children's future. Hopefully, this will serve as a wake-up call to our state leaders that it is time to do something about the state's irrational funding system for public education."

At a Conejo Valley Unified school board meeting Tuesday night, administrators and trustees wanted to know how the propositions were fairing.

"It's not good," said Dep. Superintendent Jeff Baarstad. "I think they're all failing."

Earlier polls had predicted the near total defeat.

But Baarstad, who's head of business services at CVUSD, hadn't been counting on the Prop. 1B money to begin with. He said Conejo schools will need to cut another $4.7 million from the district's budget this fiscal year— which ends in a month. The school district has already been cut by $5.2 million.

"There's really nothing we can do to cut that kind of money by June 1 in any budget," Baarstad said. "We're going to have to use reserves."

The Las Virgenes Unified School District budget will be cut retroactively at the end of the year by an estimated $2.6 million, Superintendent Don Zimring said.

"How do you go back and cut $2.6 million that has already been spent in services and programs provided to students?" Zimring asked. "This is what has been threatened, and I need to stress it was a threat—a campaign strategy to pass these initiatives."

Education isn't the only victim. City governments from Camarillo to Calabasas are also bracing for a reduction in state revenues and will be forced to map out new financial strategies.

Voter turnout across the state was low. Only 26 percent of Ventura County voters participated.