In response to Cathy Carlson's March 5 letter, I'm a Republican and also a very active member of Conejo Council PTA.

Before I became a member of PTA, I had many of the same misconceptions that Cathy Carlson has. I, however, decided that getting involved in PTA was my way of making sure that my viewpoints would be heard.

To my surprise, I found no leftsided agenda and no antiRepublican sentiment.

Instead I found wonderful people who were doing great things for the welfare of children. They inspired me to become involved not only for my children, but for all children.

In fact the mission of PTA is to promote the welfare of children and youth. In my seven years as a PTA member, I've never heard the political preferences of anyone on Conejo Council or the 12th District.

It's not discussed, nor is a hint of it even present.

I've been to the California State PTA convention five times—and again, no partisan viewpoints have been expressed. I've never heard the words "Democrat" or "Republican" but instead words like "advocacy" and "What's best for the children?"

In defense of my friend, Peggy Buckles, she did organize the protest and did notify many nonpartisan groups that are also interested in public education.

It wasn't organized as a protest against Republicans but as a protest against budget cuts to education.

In reality, a political group not affiliated with PTA became aware of the protest through the teachers union, and they organized a group that also attended the rally.

Neither Mrs. Buckles nor the PTA can be held responsible for this group's viewpoints, their actions or what they decided to put on their signs. And aren't we a country whose people have the right to protest, no matter what their viewpoints?

I'm a Republican who disagrees with a fellow Republican.

I challenge Mrs. Carlson to become involved with the process and not just point fingers. As I always tell my children, "Are you going to be part of the problem or part of the solution?" Denise Reader Thousand Oaks