Contact UsRSS RSS Feed
Advertisers Index
Shopping
Going Out
Health
Faith
Youth
Real Estate
May 10, 2007
Search Archives


Board of supervisors calls for term limits
By Sylvie Belmond belmond@theacorn.com

Ventura County supervisors voted 4-0 to place a term limits measure on the November 2008 general election ballot.

If voters pass the measure, starting January 2009 county officials will be permitted to serve only three consecutive four-year terms. Incumbents would then be required to take a four-year hiatus before they could run again.

Current and prior terms served would not count toward the new limit, so current supervisors could stay in office for another 12 years if the measure passes and they're reelected, said Supervisor Peter Foy, who initiated the proposal.

The new term limits will give supervisors enough time to learn how government functions and get things accomplished but also provide a chance for newcomers who want to serve on the board, according to supporters.

"Incumbency is a very difficult thing to overcome for newcomers, who should have an opportunity too," said Foy.

Supervisors Linda Parks and Steve Bennett supported the idea. Bennett suggested that the measure be put on the November 2008 ballot, when voter turnout should be high due to a presidential election.

In a more critical assessment of the proposal, Supervisor Kathy Long said short terms can prevent officials from addressing longterm issues. Sacramento legislators are constantly running for reelection because they serve two-year terms. Despite these concerns, Long opted to let voters decide because, she said, term limits could make sense at the local level.

Supervisor John Flynn abstained because he's been on the board for 30 years, he said. "It would be hypocritical for me to vote in favor of this," Flynn said.

"Term limits create a more level playing field for candidates," said Camarillo resident David Spady, who attended the April 24 board meeting. He said career politicians are counterproductive and seem to spend more public funds.

In another matter, the board narrowly approved a proposal to raise maximum campaign contributions from $600 to $700 for candidates who agree to cap spending at $173,000.

Those who don't want to abide by the spending limit can accept maximum contributions of $350, up from $300.

The new rules will take effect before the upcoming supervisor race. Officials also decided to hire private lawyers to review alleged campaign violations instead of relying on volunteer lawyers and county staff.

Officials plan to discuss additional campaign matters at a later meeting.